« August 2009 | Main | October 2009 »
This S&P 500 constituent and former blue-chip darling was a $90 stock in 2004. While I doubt it will ever see $90 again, this is a classic case of the baby being thrown out with the bathwater. Despite carnage within the newspaper industry, Gannett still holds some quality assets, including 84 daily newspapers with estimated circulation of 6.6 million, 700 nondaily publications, 23 television stations, and a Web site that drew 27.1 million visitors in January. The crown jewel of this empire is USA Today, the nation's largest-selling daily newspaper with circulation of about 2.3 million.
Concerns about levels of debt have been abated, at least for now, as a result of a private exchange offer. Gannett still has $3.5 billion in long-term debt, but there are no maturities until June 2011 ($432 million) and July 2011($280 million). (The Company also just announced a private offering of $400 million in senior notes, maturing in 2014 and 2017, presumably to further pay down its credit facility; more details forthcoming.) That's still more debt than I am typically comfortable with, but Gannett has at least bought itself some time.
Jen: Over the past week or so we've been chatting up a new survey from Cribb, Greene & Associates that takes the pulse of smaller market newspapers. Principal John Cribb revealed some of the results during last week's Fitz & Jen podcast edition. Today, Cribb released more details.
he news is relatively upbeat: More than half of those surveyed think ad revenue will be up next year and the same percentage would actually purchase a newspaper.
The survey polled executives from 126 newspapers -- 29% were from daily newspapers, 49% were from weeklies and 22% were from a combination of the two. Below are the findings.
Q: Do you think the local economy in your publication market is improving, declining, or about the same as last year?
Q: Next year do you believe your bottom line will be up, down or about the same as this year?
Q: When the economy improves, do you think your bottom line will be better than it was before the downturn, worse or about the same?
Q: Next year do you believe your total advertising revenues will be up, down or about the same as this year?
Q: If you currently print in-house, would you consider outsourcing your printing and eliminating your press?
Q. Would you consider purchasing a newspaper currently?
The New York Times has been acting very coy about its plans for charging for some content. Executive Editor Bill Keller reveals the strategy "will come down to a gut call." Sigh. (New York Observer)
Larry Marsh says the key for newspapers' survival is a "daily me" type of customized news model a la Amazon's recommendations -- not knowing there is something called "DailyMe" that does just that. (Midwest Voice @ KCStar)
Some big-wig advertisers agree to test online research. (Media Decoder)
A possible set-back for BT ads: Two-thirds of Americans don't want to be tracked by advertisers. (NYT)
Jeremy Halbreich to the Chicago Newspaper Guild: There's only one party interested in owning the Sun-Times Media Group. (News Bites)
The owners of the San Diego News Network have formed a parent company called U.S. Local News Network. Look for a version in your city soon! (paidContent)
Jen: It's not everyday that a newspaper company rushes to get out quarterly results before executives are scheduled for the conference call.
Gannett though is too happy to sit on the news that they are beating the Street's expectations with EPS expected to come in at $0.39 to $0.42 versus the consensus of $0.31. The company also reported that ad revenue, while still down (way down actually) it's an improvement over Q2.
J.P. Morgan equity research analysts Alexia Quadrani and Monica DiCenso crash this little party over in McLean, Va., by writing in a note that newspaper ad revenue year-over-year comparisons are actually easing in Q3. This implies "that overall newspaper ad trends have clearly not rebounded," they wrote.
As noted elsewhere earlier, Gannett pulled off this feat by cost cutting.
Quadrani and DiCenso rework their estimates on Gannett increasing anticipated EBITDA margins to 20.3% from 19%. They set a new $12 price target for shares of Gannett for 2010. Still they part with this comment: "With revenue declines continuing to track below expectations and more hurdles on the cost side ahead (from difficult comparisons and rising paper expense), we believe we are approaching a ceiling in the share price at these levels."
Jen: Much more apparently. A big FYI here: UPS is getting in the direct mail business. Kenneth Hein reporting for our sister pub Adweek has the low-down.
UPS is testing the delivery of small packages filled with premium offers and samples in Chicago (Fitz!), Dallas (Hi mom!), Washington D.C., Phoenix and Miami. Gordon Borrell of Borrell Associates notes it's going to be tough even for the guys in brown. Spending on direct mail is supposed to decline 39% over the next five years.
Still, the 'BB' rating reflects the secular shift in revenue away from Gannett's newspaper business, which has been exacerbated by an extended period of cyclical pressure, and the difficulty at this time in estimating how much the pace of decline in newspaper ad revenue might moderate over the intermediate term. In addition, we anticipate that leverage will increase. Gannett's focus on using its still-large discretionary cash flow generation for debt repayment to help limit the leverage increase to a relatively moderate level (compared to other U.S.-based newspaper companies) only partially offsets these negative credit factors.That didn't harsh the buzz about newspapers on Wall Street, though. Just before the closing bell Tuesday, Gannett continued to lead the sector north -- jumping 16.2% on a $1.62 gain to $11.60 a share.
Advertisement
A breezy, business-oriented blog on the ups and downs of the newspaper industry by E&P's Editor-at-Large Mark Fitzgerald (in Chicago) and Associate Editor Jennifer Saba (in New York). Between them, they have won seven Jesse H. Neal Awards, the top prize for the business press, in the past six years.
Advertisement